OPES PROPERTIES, LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as OPES PROPERTIES, LLC · taxpayer 32036915232 · on the county rolls as OPES PROPERTIES LLC · mail to 7702 FM 1960 E 219 HUMBLE TX 77346Matched to a Texas filing

$1,912,400Market value

10Properties

993Sq ft living area

≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,912,400total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$75,790median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Medina 10
ZIPs: 78009, 78056, 78059, 78850, 78861
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 18993
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 16981

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: OPES PROPERTIES, LLC
Name we searched: OPES PROPERTIES LLC
Taxpayer number: 32036915232
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2008-04-30
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0800971756
Registered agent: JEFFREY W BURNETT
Filing mailing address: 7702 FM 1960 RD E STE 219 HUMBLE TX 77346

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000076720	CR 211 HONDO 78861	medina	$570	0	not on the roll	16981
000000002584	CR 211 ESM HONDO 78861	medina	$11,380	0	not on the roll	18993
000000011282	CR 211 ESM NATALIA 78059	medina	$38,180	0	not on the roll	18993
000000002585	CR 211 ESM HONDO 78861	medina	$46,420	0	not on the roll	18993
000000009981	CR 211 HONDO 78861	medina	$75,480	0	not on the roll	16981
000000011284	CR 211 ESM NATALIA 78059	medina	$76,100	0	not on the roll	18993
000000053212	CR 211 DHANIS 78850	medina	$84,650	993	1983	16981
000000012553	CR 211 ESM MICO 78056	medina	$119,960	0	not on the roll	18993
000000011652	CR 211 ESM CASTROVILLE 78009	medina	$546,100	0	not on the roll	18993
000000012568	CR 211 MICO 78056	medina	$913,560	0	not on the roll	16981
10 properties			$1,912,400	993

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Member: JEFFREY BURNETT

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered