Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Benton City Water Supply Corporation

Filed as BENTON CITY WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION · taxpayer 30113234758 · on the county rolls as BENTON CITY WATER SUPPLY CORP · mail to 980 FM 3175 LYTLE TX 78052Matched to a Texas filing
$1,804,710Market value
14Properties
7,666Sq ft living area
≈6Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

14parcels on the rolls

6 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈6units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,804,710total market value

County roll value across all 14 parcels

$107,960median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Atascosa 10, Medina 4
ZIPs
78011, 78016, 78026, 78050, 78052, 78059, 78064, 78065
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 14
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 14
Most recent purchase date on the roll
9380
Earliest purchase date on the roll
10291

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
BENTON CITY WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION
Name we searched
BENTON CITY WATER SUPPLY CORP
Taxpayer number
30113234758
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1988-12-28
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0109885301
Registered agent
ADRIAN L GOODSON
Filing mailing address
980 FM 3175 LYTLE TX 78052

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 6 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

14 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000015567980 FM 3175 LYTLE 78052atascosa$524,6407,2021982not on the roll
0000000124431725 FM 2504 POTEET 78065atascosa$160,0000not on the roll16786
000000220822FM 1333 CHARLOTTE 78011atascosa$160,0000not on the roll19199
0000000587481060 FM 2504 POTEET 78065atascosa$149,670464200011437
0000000552012035 CR 307 POTEET 78064atascosa$115,1200not on the roll10291
0000000523991826 CR 777 DEVINE 78016medina$111,5900not on the roll9380
000000057116TABERRER RD PLEASANTON 78050atascosa$110,9200not on the rollnot on the roll
000000222182POTEET TEXAS 78064atascosa$105,0000not on the roll19060
0000000581392735 OLD DEVINE RD JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$86,6600not on the rollnot on the roll
000000065200597 CLEAR LAKE DR PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$72,1700not on the roll14677
000000016337415 FOREST OAKS DR PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$64,2800not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000377241330 CR 770 NATALIA 78059medina$61,5300not on the roll8406
0000000254851029 CR 6846 LYTLE 78052medina$54,3400not on the roll8422
0000000379341774 CR 777 DEVINE 78016medina$28,7900not on the roll8469
14 properties$1,804,7107,666

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered