RTK LIVING LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as RTK LIVING LLC · taxpayer 32097210770 · on the county rolls as RTK LIVING LLC · mail to 4212 MYRTLE BEACH PRIME AUSTIN TX 78738Matched to a Texas filing

$5,436,520Market value

3Properties

72,462Sq ft living area

≈3Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

3parcels on the rolls

3 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈3units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$5,436,520total market value

County roll value across all 3 parcels

$260,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 2, Kendall 1
ZIPs: 78225, 78233, 78624
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 3
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 3
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20256
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 19226

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: RTK LIVING LLC
Name we searched: RTK LIVING LLC
Taxpayer number: 32097210770
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2024-10-18
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0805750280
Registered agent: TAMARA KUMAR
Filing mailing address: 2110 RANCH ROAD 620 S UNIT 341851 LAKEWAY TX 78734

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 3 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

3 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000022571	110 BLUEBONNET CIR FREDERICKSBURG 78624	kendall	$5,000,000	68,886	2020	19226
000000620723	6814 KNIGHTS HVN LIVE OAK 78233	bexar	$260,000	2,527	2002	20024
000000437241	139 WICHITA CT SAN ANTONIO 78225	bexar	$176,520	1,049	1947	20256
3 properties			$5,436,520	72,462

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager: TAMARA KUMAR
Member: TAMARA PETERSONKUMAR

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered