Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Rothe Martin Ranch, Llc

Filed as ROTHE MARTIN RANCH, LLC · taxpayer 32074386858 · on the county rolls as ROTHE MARTIN RANCH LLC · mail to 1100 PINNACLE VIEW DR E KERRVILLE TX 77483Matched to a Texas filing
$10,123,720Market value
10Properties
1,118Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$10,123,720total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$1,024,220median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Medina 10
ZIPs
78016, 78056, 78057, 78861
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18450
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18450

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
ROTHE MARTIN RANCH, LLC
Name we searched
ROTHE MARTIN RANCH LLC
Taxpayer number
32074386858
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
2020-05-26
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0803631512
Registered agent
KATHRYN SCHOTT
Filing mailing address
2918 AVENUE D KATY TX 77493

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000010014CR 211 ESM HONDO 78861medina$2,240,0000not on the roll18450
000000010259CR 211 ESM HONDO 78861medina$2,240,0000not on the roll18450
000000012589CR 211 ESM MICO 78056medina$1,535,7700not on the roll18450
000000012628CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$1,120,0000not on the roll18450
000000010262CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$1,046,9800not on the roll18450
000000009965MOORE 78057medina$1,001,4600not on the roll18450
000000012594CR 211 ESM MICO 78056medina$595,0000not on the roll18450
000000012596CR 211 MICO 78056medina$290,5000not on the roll18450
000000506081CR 211 DEVINE 78016medina$47,4001,118018450
000000083762CR 211 MOORE 78057medina$6,6100not on the roll18450
10 properties$10,123,7201,118

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Member
NANCY ELTON

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered