Landlord profile

Spicer Family Real Estate Ltd Partnership

on the county rolls as SPICER FAMILY REAL ESTATE LTD PARTNERSHIP · mail to 17422 OCONNOR RD 100 SAN ANTONIO TX 78247No Texas filing under this name
$2,662,360Market value
11Properties
15,449Sq ft living area
≈11Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈11units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,662,360total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$254,900median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 9, Comal 2
ZIPs
78133, 78217, 78233, 78247
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
16848
Earliest purchase date on the roll
13041

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000000037500 TBD CANYON LAKE 78133comal$42,0200not on the roll13175
0000006161135223 GALACINO ST SAN ANTONIO 78247bexar$195,510978197813041
0000005994596062 HOPES FERRY ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$212,2501,337197813041
0000006751354659 MISTY RUN SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$217,8401,344197916848
00000059930112506 MINUTEMAN DR SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$228,0401,372197413041
0000005467504910 EL GUSTO ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$254,9001,618197013041
00000030044911606 FOREST HOLLOW LIVE OAK 78233bexar$256,2701,532198516680
0000005956765124 LA POSITA ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$267,2001,642197313041
0000005078558506 SAGEBRUSH LN SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$298,7801,880196013041
0000005078872902 OLD RANCH RD SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$341,9801,662195813041
000000003752547 CARPENTER DR CANYON LAKE 78133comal$347,5702,084197613175
11 properties$2,662,36015,449

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered