Landlord profile

F15 Properties Gp, Llc

Filed as F15 PROPERTIES GP, LLC · taxpayer 32048575289 · on the county rolls as F15 PROPERTIES · mail to 3960 ELAM CREEK DR MEDINA TX 78055Matched to a Texas filing
$6,730,344Market value
12Properties
2,568Sq ft living area
≈2Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

2 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈2units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$6,730,344total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$48,615median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bandera 12
ZIPs
78003, 78055, 78063
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll
15544
Earliest purchase date on the roll
15544

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
F15 PROPERTIES GP, LLC
Name we searched
F15 PROPERTIES
Taxpayer number
32048575289
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2012-07-24
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0801630545
Registered agent
SCOTT MALONE
Filing mailing address
3960 ELAM CREEK RD MEDINA TX 78055

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 2 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000183511MEDINA 78003bandera$2,675,3101,320015544
000000183513ELAM CREEK MEDINA 78003bandera$2,096,2401,248194015544
000000150577ELAM CREEK RD PIPE CREEK 78063bandera$1,399,5100not on the roll15544
000000150586ELAM CREEK RD PIPE CREEK 78063bandera$281,5600not on the roll15544
000000183512MEDINA 78003bandera$163,4000not on the roll15544
000000183515ELAM CREEK MEDINA 78003bandera$91,9500not on the roll15544
000000183543ELAM CREEK RD MEDINA 78003bandera$5,2800not on the roll15544
0000001835033960 ELAM CREEK MEDINA 78055bandera$5,0600not on the roll15544
000000183505MEDINA 78055bandera$4,6000not on the roll15544
000000183538ELAM CREEK RD MEDINA 78003bandera$4,2830not on the roll15544
000000183528ELAM CREEK RD MEDINA 78003bandera$1,8200not on the roll15544
000000183533ELAM CREEK RD MEDINA 78003bandera$1,3310not on the roll15544
12 properties$6,730,3442,568

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager
SCOTT MALONE

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered