Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

John Smith Sale, Llc

Filed as JOHN SMITH SALE, LLC · taxpayer 32087307008 · on the county rolls as JOHN SMITH SA LLC · mail to 4135 HIGH SIERRA DR SAN ANTONIO TX 78228Matched to a Texas filing
$2,404,230Market value
11Properties
0Sq ft living area
≈11Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

11 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈11units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,404,230total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$210,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 11
ZIPs
78229
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19565
Earliest purchase date on the roll
19565

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
JOHN SMITH SALE, LLC
Name we searched
JOHN SMITH SA LLC
Taxpayer number
32087307008
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX INVOLUNTARILY ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
2022-11-22
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0804828238
Registered agent
JOHN S SALE
Filing mailing address
5020 ANDOVER DR PLANO TX 75023

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 11 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000005317007418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$165,0000not on the roll19565
0000005316897418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$196,8600not on the roll19565
0000005316917418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$200,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317027418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$200,0000not on the roll19565
0000005316927418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$210,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317037418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$210,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317057418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$217,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317047418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$233,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317067418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$233,0000not on the roll19565
0000005316907418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$244,0000not on the roll19565
0000005317017418 JOHN SMITH SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$295,3700not on the roll19565
11 properties$2,404,2300

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Member
JOHN SMITH SALE

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered