SLATE NONNC NONWA PROPERTY OWNER LLC CO LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS LAND CONSTRUCTION LTD

Landlord profile

Slate Nonnc Nonwa Property Owner Llc Co Lennar Homes Of Texas Land Construction Ltd

on the county rolls as SLATE NONNC NONWA PROPERTY OWNER LLC CO LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS LAND CONSTRUCTION LTD · mail to 100 NE LOOP 410 1155 SAN ANTONIO TX 78216Our registry lookup was rejected

$2,223,464Market value

7Properties

14,628Sq ft living area

≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

7parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,223,464total market value

County roll value across all 7 parcels

$324,750median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Comal 7
ZIPs: 78130, 78132, 78163
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 7
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 7
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20287
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 19962

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,577 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

7 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000408053	32118 LEMON MINT BULVERDE 78163	comal	$384,600	3,178	2017	20024
000000408713	1979 HEATHER GLEN DR NEW BRAUNFELS 78130	comal	$350,418	2,755	2018	19962
000000408054	32122 LEMON MINT BULVERDE 78163	comal	$330,000	2,463	2017	20287
000000479856	4015 ELDORADO NEW BRAUNFELS 78130	comal	$324,750	1,276	2024	20048
000000457767	760 OPOSSUM TRL NEW BRAUNFELS 78132	comal	$300,157	1,912	2023	19962
000000408055	32126 LEMON MINT BULVERDE 78163	comal	$300,000	1,768	2017	20287
000000478217	4015 ELDORADO NEW BRAUNFELS 78130	comal	$233,539	1,276	2024	20048
7 properties			$2,223,464	14,628

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered