Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Boron 5 Tx Llc

on the county rolls as BORON 5 TX LLC · mail to 3225 MCLEOD DR 100 LAS VEGAS NV 89121Our registry lookup was rejected
$1,369,000Market value
7Properties
10,844Sq ft living area
≈7Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

7parcels on the rolls

7 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈7units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,369,000total market value

County roll value across all 7 parcels

$180,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7
ZIPs
78109, 78218, 78227, 78233, 78244, 78250
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
6 of 7
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 7
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19079
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18040

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 7 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

7 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000003239084318 ROGANS HBR SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$258,0002,256200318040
0000006920148003 GRIMCHER CONVERSE 78109bexar$255,0002,400199319079
00000063216013918 BRANTLEY SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$201,0001,565198318040
0000010537196406 CANDLEWICK CT SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$180,0001,319200618052
0000005902645643 SIR GARETH DR SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$172,0001,247196918040
0000007073297546 RIMHURST SAN ANTONIO 78250bexar$153,000833198619079
0000005793727903 RIATA AVE SAN ANTONIO 78227bexar$150,0001,224196418151
7 properties$1,369,00010,844

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered