Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Premier Homes By Owner Inc

Filed as PREMIER HOMES BY OWNER INC · taxpayer 17604402895 · on the county rolls as PREMIER HOMES LLC · mail to 503 ROBLE VISTA SAN ANTONIO TX 78258Matched to a Texas filing
$704,130Market value
4Properties
5,099Sq ft living area
≈4Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

4parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈4units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$704,130total market value

County roll value across all 4 parcels

$179,085median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 4
ZIPs
78204, 78223
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 4
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 4
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20217
Earliest purchase date on the roll
19942

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
PREMIER HOMES BY OWNER INC
Name we searched
PREMIER HOMES LLC
Taxpayer number
17604402895
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX INVOLUNTARILY ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
1994-06-29
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0131786300
Registered agent
LLOYD E ARNOLD JR
Filing mailing address
4707 DUNLEIGH CT SUGAR LAND TX 77479

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

4 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000373318123 NANCY SAN ANTONIO 78204bexar$224,0601,386194619942
000000372219147 SOLME SAN ANTONIO 78204bexar$182,2901,460194020189
000000386506927 FAIR AVE SAN ANTONIO 78223bexar$175,8801,038193920217
000000373317117 NANCY SAN ANTONIO 78204bexar$121,9001,215194619942
4 properties$704,1305,099

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered