Landlord profile

D S Realty Investments Ltd

on the county rolls as D S REALTY INVESTMENTS LTD · mail to 225 S COMMONS FORD RD AUSTIN TX 78733No Texas filing under this name
$4,512,140Market value
13Properties
24,010Sq ft living area
≈17Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

13 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈17units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$4,512,140total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$306,996median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 6, Williamson 5, Hays 2
ZIPs
78233, 78610, 78613, 78620, 78729, 78750
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
12872
Earliest purchase date on the roll
-718170

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 13 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
56641101 SPRINGLAKE DR DRIPPING SPRINGS TX 78620hays$914,9003,5461994not on the roll
1263302304 DIJON DR CEDAR PARK TX 78613williamson$404,2082,0241976.00000012408
11746912532 SPLIT RAIL PKWY AUSTIN TX 78750williamson$373,8171,5561980.00000012408
1446021315 TEXAS OAK WY CEDAR PARK TX 78613williamson$354,4321,3441986.00000012408
1125369720 ANDERSON VILLAGE DR AUSTIN TX 78729williamson$326,8181,3761982.00000012408
51658500 REBEL DR BUDA TX 78610hays$325,9691,8641985-718170
959201510 DANDRIDGE DR CEDAR PARK TX 78613williamson$306,9961,2311979.00000012408
0000006105265719 FOUNTAINWOOD ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$268,0002,271197812745
00000059936312407 ALEXANDRIA ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$260,0001,784197412872
0000005997545907 LITTLE BRANDYWINE CRK SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$254,0001,903197412843
00000059928812414 STATEHOUSE ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$250,0001,686197312744
00000061014313702 EARLYWOOD ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$240,0001,747197712856
00000061481914035 FLAIRWOOD ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$233,0001,678198012745
13 properties$4,512,14024,010

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered