Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Fast Giraffe Tx Llc

on the county rolls as FAST GIRAFFE TX LLC · mail to 3225 MCLEOD DR 100 LAS VEGAS NV 89121Our registry lookup was rejected
$1,796,944Market value
8Properties
14,624Sq ft living area
≈7Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

8parcels on the rolls

7 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈7units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,796,944total market value

County roll value across all 8 parcels

$226,012median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7, Guadalupe 1
ZIPs
78155, 78202, 78218, 78221, 78223, 78233, 78239, 78250
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
5 of 8
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 8
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20214
Earliest purchase date on the roll
20011

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 7 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

8 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value ↑Sq ftBuiltAcquired
00000140055013014 LORENA OCHOA SAN ANTONIO 78221bexar$176,1202,407202420210
000000998092915 CANTON SAN ANTONIO 78202bexar$213,5891,395193820214
0000007162599217 VILLAGE BROWN SAN ANTONIO 78250bexar$225,6101,501199620077
0000001885801317 ORCHARD OAKS SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$225,8952,408020132
0000005335974218 MABUNI DR SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$226,1301,312196620199
0000010475377435 CIR FARM SAN ANTONIO 78239bexar$240,5501,785200620011
0000010959844323 TSON PARK SAN ANTONIO 78223bexar$240,5802,060200820073
00000054978112107 EL SENDERO ST SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$248,4701,756197220193
8 properties$1,796,94414,624

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered