Landlord profile

Brooklyn Dicaro Llc Series 300

on the county rolls as BROOKLYN DICARO LLC SERIES 300 · mail to 1515 BENSDALE RD PLEASANTON TX 78064No Texas filing under this name
$29,234,466Market value
16Properties
455,159Sq ft living area
≈16Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

16parcels on the rolls

16 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈16units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$29,234,466total market value

County roll value across all 16 parcels

$1,943,670median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Atascosa 16
ZIPs
78011, 78026, 78052, 78064, 78065, 78073
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 16
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 16
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19916
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18172

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 16 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

16 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000064541WINSHIP RD CHARLOTTE 78064atascosa$16,6200not on the roll18172
000000164394WINSHIP RD FLORESVILLE 78073atascosa$23,7500not on the roll18172
0000000281311354 W OAKLAWN ST PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$39,4190not on the roll18172
000000164085OAKHAVEN DR LYTLE 78026atascosa$51,3800not on the roll18172
000000164111W OAKLAWN ST PLEASANTON 78026atascosa$74,9100not on the roll18172
0000000149101300 W OAKLAWN ST PLEASANTON 78064 78064atascosa$157,6770not on the roll18172
0000001641092140 W OAKLAWN PLEASANTON 78026atascosa$438,8103,000201218172
000000219607S SH 16 PLEASANTON 78065atascosa$1,588,32039,850202219916
000000012817IH 35 LYTLE TEXAS 78052atascosa$2,299,02038,975202319916
000000164084W OAKLAWN LYTLE 78026atascosa$2,315,97017,900201118172
000000028132W OAKLAWN RD PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$2,404,67023,386200618172
000000189401PLEASANTON 78011atascosa$2,729,33035,654202419916
000000164110W OAKLAWN PLEASANTON 78026atascosa$2,907,88019,880201218172
0000001819801780 E SH 97 PLEASANTON 78026atascosa$3,400,00062,728201919916
0000000148881222 W OAKLAWN PLEASANTON 78064 78064atascosa$4,286,71079,243201318172
0000000120281501 BENSDALE RD PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$6,500,000134,543199718172
16 properties$29,234,466455,159

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered