RANCHWY LLC

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as RANCHWY LLC · mail to PO BOX 312185 NEW BRAUNFELS TX 78131No Texas filing under this name

$1,533,000Market value

11Properties

13,119Sq ft living area

≈11Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈11units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,533,000total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$147,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 11
ZIPs: 78201, 78211, 78213, 78214, 78223, 78224, 78225, 78226
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 1 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20108
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 16819

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000477034	279 CADDO SAN ANTONIO 78211	bexar	$95,000	720	2001	16819
000000460490	62 WHITMAN AVE SAN ANTONIO 78211	bexar	$98,000	992	1953	17477
000000441945	135 KASHMUIR PL SAN ANTONIO 78223	bexar	$100,000	724	1948	17266
000000392163	246 PLETZ DR SAN ANTONIO 78226	bexar	$140,000	1,661	1953	20108
000000510362	1719 DAWNRIDGE DR SAN ANTONIO 78213	bexar	$145,000	925	1959	17169
000000397531	1231 KENDALIA AVE SAN ANTONIO 78224	bexar	$147,000	1,296	1952	18151
000000471153	271 KATE SCHENCK AVE SAN ANTONIO 78223	bexar	$150,000	1,230	1958	17876
000000400232	138 MORRILL AVE SAN ANTONIO 78214	bexar	$151,000	1,120	1915	17232
000000428300	404 CLIFF AVE SAN ANTONIO 78214	bexar	$155,000	1,545	1938	17784
000000146949	153 TAFT BLVD SAN ANTONIO 78225	bexar	$158,000	1,344	1917	17204
000000387611	235 GARDINA SAN ANTONIO 78201	bexar	$194,000	1,562	1965	17141
11 properties			$1,533,000	13,119

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered