Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Bexar Management And Development Corporation

Filed as BEXAR MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION · taxpayer 32001438889 · on the county rolls as BEXAR MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ATTN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR · mail to 1954 E HOUSTON ST 104 SAN ANTONIO TX 78202 USMatched to a Texas filing
$101,652,450Market value
10Properties
1,259,117Sq ft living area
≈1,399Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

6 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1,399units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$101,652,450total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$4,894,675median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 10
ZIPs
78109, 78202, 78242, 78244, 78252, 78253, 78254
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20054
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18451

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
BEXAR MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Name we searched
BEXAR MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ATTN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Taxpayer number
32001438889
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1999-04-05
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0153077101
Registered agent
MARK A SANCHEZ
Filing mailing address
6243 W INTERSTATE 10 STE 1025 SAN ANTONIO TX 78201

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 6 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000013250997810 WALZEM SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$37,285,290249,633202018451
0000013485396175 S LOOP SAN ANTONIO 78252bexar$17,368,900193,640202118695
0000013174307554 FM 78 SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$13,300,000271,962202118655
0000005521606200 OLD PEARSALL RD SAN ANTONIO 78242bexar$12,261,510180,212200419691
0000013535748212 TALLEY RD SAN ANTONIO 78254bexar$4,939,8000not on the roll18982
000001437842CULEBRA RD SAN ANTONIO 78253bexar$4,849,5500not on the roll20011
00000143515814522 LANDON RIDGE SAN ANTONIO 78253bexar$4,159,320363,670202319355
0000001146101954 E HOUSTON ST SAN ANTONIO 78202bexar$3,771,4300not on the roll19180
0000013516348833 BINZ ENGLEMAN RD CONVERSE 78109bexar$2,565,4900not on the roll18828
000001440640SCHUWIRTH RD CONVERSE 78109bexar$1,151,1600not on the roll20054
10 properties$101,652,4501,259,117

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,386 owners of the 71,641 inside the coverage rules, 35.4% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,841 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,414 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,641 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered