Landlord profile

Deer Creek Crossing, L.L.C.

Filed as DEER CREEK CROSSING, L.L.C. · taxpayer 32062066785 · on the county rolls as DEER CREEK CROSSING LLC · mail to PO BOX 713 UTOPIA TX 78884Matched to a Texas filing
$15,601,050Market value
14Properties
6,439Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

14parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$15,601,050total market value

County roll value across all 14 parcels

$728,525median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bandera 14
ZIPs
78003, 78055
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 14
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 14
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18670
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17126

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
DEER CREEK CROSSING, L.L.C.
Name we searched
DEER CREEK CROSSING LLC
Taxpayer number
32062066785
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2016-11-14
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0802583508
Registered agent
JAMES J ELLISON
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 713 UTOPIA TX 78884

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

14 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000146093MEDINA 78055bandera$4,308,9600not on the roll18670
000000146086MAZUREK MEDINA 78055bandera$2,474,4900not on the roll18670
0000001619682800 SECO CREEK BANDERA 78003bandera$1,666,7100not on the roll17126
000000146096MEDINA 78055bandera$1,571,8000not on the roll18670
000000146089SECO PASS MEDINA 78055bandera$1,548,0800not on the roll18670
000000146085FM 470 MEDINA 78055bandera$1,072,1700not on the roll18670
0000001619582800 SECO CREEK BANDERA 78003bandera$880,7800not on the roll17126
000000146095MAZUREK MEDINA 78055bandera$576,2700not on the roll18670
000000146087819 MAZUREK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$504,4204,131198018670
000000146090MAZUREK MEDINA 78055bandera$346,5500not on the roll18670
000000146088SECO PASS MEDINA 78055bandera$299,4000not on the roll18670
0000001619672800 SECO CREEK BANDERA 78003bandera$172,5402,308193017126
000000146094MEDINA 78055bandera$154,2000not on the roll18670
0000001619572800 SECO CREEK BANDERA 78003bandera$24,6800not on the roll17126
14 properties$15,601,0506,439

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director
LINDA ELLISON

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered