Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Twins Management Food Mart, Llc

Filed as TWINS MANAGEMENT FOOD MART, LLC · taxpayer 32067943046 · on the county rolls as WCW NACO LLC · mail to 9237 E VIA DE FORTUNA 110 SCOTSDALE AZ 85258Matched to a Texas filing
$15,366,550Market value
10Properties
0Sq ft living area
≈9Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

9 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈9units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$15,366,550total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$1,719,065median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7, Comal 3
ZIPs
78130, 78132, 78148, 78216, 78217, 78230, 78239, 78244, 78251
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
10 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19137
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17808

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
TWINS MANAGEMENT FOOD MART, LLC
Name we searched
WCW NACO LLC
Taxpayer number
32067943046
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX INVOLUNTARILY ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
2018-08-01
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0803081074
Registered agent
JORGE RAMIREZ
Filing mailing address
3310 CROSSMAN AVE DALLAS TX 75212

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 9 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000013045067576 CULEBRA RD SAN ANTONIO 78251bexar$2,530,3500not on the roll18890
00000063031011441 HUEBNER RD SAN ANTONIO 78230bexar$1,952,6400not on the roll18596
0000012973451431 PAT BOOKER RD UNIVERSAL CITY 78148bexar$1,886,6400not on the roll17808
0000010970096001 MONTGOMERY WINDCREST 78239bexar$1,796,3600not on the roll18186
0000013528916307 RITTIMAN RD SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$1,787,7300not on the roll19137
0000003799971668 STATE HWY 46 W NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$1,650,4000not on the roll18198
0000003935071064 STATE HWY 46 S NEW BRAUNFELS 78130comal$1,167,4900not on the roll17841
00000130079611914 BLANCO RD SAN ANTONIO 78216bexar$1,153,1000not on the roll18618
00000055422813003 NACOGDOCHES RD SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$963,6300not on the roll18618
0000003847931668 STATE HWY 46 W NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$478,2100not on the roll18198
10 properties$15,366,5500

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Sole Owner
JORGE RAMIREZ

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered