E TO W PROPERTIES LLC

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as E TO W PROPERTIES LLC · mail to PO BOX 792343 SAN ANTONIO TX 78279No Texas filing under this name

$1,389,783Market value

11Properties

9,458Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,389,783total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$107,910median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 11
ZIPs: 78201, 78202, 78203, 78207, 78208, 78210, 78220
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 16651
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 10332

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000118310	302 DENVER BLVD SAN ANTONIO 78210	bexar	$413,110	1,152	1965	not on the roll
000000106131	118 POTOMAC SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$145,080	1,084	1920	14729
000000152344	415 HARDING PL SAN ANTONIO 78203	bexar	$127,035	1,300	1918	not on the roll
000000453201	462 RLING DR SAN ANTONIO 78220	bexar	$115,998	1,126	1959	14809
000000453133	774 G ST SAN ANTONIO 78220	bexar	$109,148	840	1988	16052
000000375114	419 GULF SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$107,910	968	1928	15566
000000513789	1311 NORFLEET ST SAN ANTONIO 78208	bexar	$100,546	672	1942	16639
000000415976	414 VANCE JACKSON RD SAN ANTONIO 78201	bexar	$100,265	804	1944	10332
000000114310	226 EROSS SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$93,031	600	1920	16651
000000128740	512 N BRAZOS ST SAN ANTONIO 78207	bexar	$69,572	912	1900	not on the roll
000000128754	1048 RIEBE ALY SAN ANTONIO 78207	bexar	$8,088	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
11 properties			$1,389,783	9,458

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered