Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Dabas Investment Group, Llc

Filed as DABAS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC · taxpayer 32015062584 · on the county rolls as YA RUB INVESTMENTS LP · mail to 3 PARK ROYAL LN SAN ANTONIO TX 78229Matched to a Texas filing
$6,348,500Market value
17Properties
2,767Sq ft living area
≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

17parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$6,348,500total market value

County roll value across all 17 parcels

$205,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bandera 15, Bexar 1, Comal 1
ZIPs
78003, 78055, 78063, 78130, 78229
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 17
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 17
Most recent purchase date on the roll
17151
Earliest purchase date on the roll
14168

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
DABAS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
Name we searched
YA RUB INVESTMENTS LP
Taxpayer number
32015062584
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2004-05-18
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0800343639
Registered agent
BASEL MOSTAFA DABAS
Filing mailing address
3 PARK ROYAL LN SAN ANTONIO TX 78229

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

17 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000149358BANDERA 78003bandera$1,490,9700not on the roll17151
000000178311FM 1283 BANDERA 78003bandera$1,470,3000not on the roll17151
0000003626392020 SUNDANCE PKWY A1 NEW BRAUNFELS 78130comal$753,0900not on the roll14168
000000181571MEDINA 78055bandera$539,4300not on the roll16056
000000161003BANDERA 78003bandera$525,490672016056
000000181574MEDINA 78055bandera$460,7400not on the roll16056
000000181570MEDINA 78055bandera$352,8700not on the roll16056
000000181569MEDINA 78055bandera$334,3200not on the roll16056
0000004884277711 CALLAGHAN RD 804 SAN ANTONIO 78229bexar$205,0002,095197416491
000000160997LAKEHILLS 78003bandera$64,9800not on the roll16056
000000181568MEDINA 78055bandera$62,1300not on the roll16056
00000017036410636 HWY 16 S MEDINA 78063bandera$50,2500not on the roll17151
000000165399LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$25,4300not on the roll16056
000000181573MEDINA 78055bandera$6,6000not on the roll16056
000000147450DEER FOREST DR W LAKEHILLS 78003bandera$4,4600not on the roll17151
000000169714MEDINA 78055bandera$1,8500not on the roll17151
000000169346HWY 16 S LAKEHILLS 78055bandera$5900not on the roll17151
17 properties$6,348,5002,767

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager
BASEL DABAS

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered