FIRSTDAY FOUNDATION

Landlord profile

Filed as FIRSTDAY FOUNDATION · taxpayer 17428743821 · on the county rolls as FIRSTDAY FOUNDATION · mail to 1506 BEXAR CROSSING SAN ANTONIO TX 78232Matched to a Texas filing

$33,028,684Market value

12Properties

10,020Sq ft living area

≈7Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

7 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈7units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$33,028,684total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$2,884,410median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 7, Atascosa 2, Comal 2, Travis 1
ZIPs: 78011, 78052, 78154, 78215, 78227, 78232, NA
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2025-01-08
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 19199

Source: 4 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: FIRSTDAY FOUNDATION
Name we searched: FIRSTDAY FOUNDATION
Taxpayer number: 17428743821
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 1997-12-18
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0147158401
Registered agent: KEVIN C DINNIN
Filing mailing address: 1506 BEXAR CROSSING ST SAN ANTONIO TX 78232

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 7 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000582110	7500 W US HIGHWY 90 SAN ANTONIO 78227	bexar	$8,849,280	0	not on the roll	19199
000000104304	318 MCCULLOUGH AVE SAN ANTONIO 78215	bexar	$4,807,800	0	not on the roll	20105
000000644647	1506 BEXAR CROSSING ST SAN ANTONIO 78232	bexar	$4,143,000	0	not on the roll	19199
000000430428	7451 FM 3009 SCHERTZ 78154	comal	$4,027,530	0	not on the roll	20202
000000582093	W US HWY 90 SAN ANTONIO 78227	bexar	$3,883,060	0	not on the roll	19199
000000582108	7404 US HIGHWY 90 SAN ANTONIO 78227	bexar	$3,124,350	0	not on the roll	19199
000000431604	7451 FM 3009 SCHERTZ 78154	comal	$2,644,470	0	not on the roll	20202
512898	7730 S IH HY 35 AUSTIN TX	travis	$1,382,803	10,020	1986	2025-01-08
000001437232	17319 SAN PEDRO AVE 207 SAN ANTONIO 78232	bexar	$89,120	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000184320	PLEASANTON 78011	atascosa	$53,730	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000582094	W US HWY 90 SAN ANTONIO 78227	bexar	$21,050	0	not on the roll	19199
000000179191	LYTLE 78052	atascosa	$2,491	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
12 properties			$33,028,684	10,020

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered