LANDLORD MAPPER / OPEN AUSTIN
Landlord profile

Smile Parks Llc Series

on the county rolls as SMILE PARKS LLC SERIES · mail to PO BOX 1117 AUSTIN TX 78767No Texas filing under this name
$603,240Market value
11Properties
8,248Sq ft living area
≈11Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

11 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈11units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$603,240total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$1,960median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 11
ZIPs
78214
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18037
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18037

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 11 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value ↓Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000440612104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$391,4992,540196818037
000000440613102 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$178,5010not on the roll18037
000001436323104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$8,5506481980not on the roll
000001436319104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$7,3506481980not on the roll
000001436322104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$7,2906481980not on the roll
000001303581104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,9607681970not on the roll
000001303576104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,8607201977not on the roll
000001303575104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,7506721972not on the roll
000001303583104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,5005001961not on the roll
000001303524104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,4905521968not on the roll
000001303573104 LORITA DR SAN ANTONIO 78214bexar$1,4905521967not on the roll
11 properties$603,2408,248

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered