Landlord profile

Rancho Del Lago, Inc.

Filed as RANCHO DEL LAGO, INC. · taxpayer 30004747579 · on the county rolls as NEW BRAUNFELS APARTMENTS LTD · mail to PO BOX 2202 CANYON LAKE TX 78133Matched to a Texas filing
$37,451,296Market value
25Properties
245,760Sq ft living area
≈271Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

25parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈271units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$37,451,296total market value

County roll value across all 25 parcels

$214,830median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Comal 25
ZIPs
78130, 78132, 78133, 78623
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 25
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 25
Most recent purchase date on the roll
8574
Earliest purchase date on the roll
10179

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
RANCHO DEL LAGO, INC.
Name we searched
NEW BRAUNFELS APARTMENTS LTD
Taxpayer number
30004747579
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1980-01-02
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0050198900
Registered agent
CRAIG HOPPER GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF LEE ROY RO
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 2202 CANYON LAKE TX 78133

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

25 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000000054491951 OLD FM 306 NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$13,339,286118,040010179
0000003989271925 OLD FM 306 NEW BRAUNFELS 78130comal$12,387,000124,384201616975
000000082752FM 306 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$2,296,1600not on the roll6363
0000000827639201 FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$2,100,4103,33604368
0000000817980 FM 32 NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$1,934,8900not on the roll4950
000000073652FM 32 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$1,798,7800not on the roll4950
0000000781310 TBD FISCHER 78623comal$960,4200not on the roll4950
000000082891FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$460,0900not on the roll4950
0000000800782249 FM 3424 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$413,4100not on the roll6363
000000082895FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$319,8700not on the roll8574
000000081885FM 306 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$305,9500not on the roll6363
0000000264418940 FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$298,4700not on the roll10256
0000000264428940 FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$214,8300not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000818284425 MAIL ROUTE RD FISCHER 78623comal$132,7600not on the roll4275
000000046097570 POSSUM TREE FISCHER 78623comal$83,6600not on the roll12606
000000115836130 FLANDERS FISCHER 78623comal$50,6700not on the roll13117
000000115809239 KELLOG FISCHER 78623comal$50,2300not on the roll12202
000000115831150 FLANDERS FISCHER 78623comal$49,5500not on the roll16240
000000115830154 FLANDERS FISCHER 78623comal$49,3100not on the roll15006
0000001158290 TBD FISCHER 78623comal$48,0700not on the roll14923
0000001157881090 MADRONE RD FISCHER 78623comal$47,0000not on the roll15097
0000000452151575 FM 3424 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$41,9700not on the roll13491
000000020137235 KAYS PL CANYON LAKE 78133comal$32,1500not on the roll18877
000000371382FM 306 CANYON LAKE 78133comal$21,9100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000081603FM 32 FISCHER 78623comal$14,4500not on the roll6756
25 properties$37,451,296245,760

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

President
LEE R ROPER

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered