7ELEVEN INC ATTN AD VALOREM TAX 7ELEVEN STORE 40588

Landlord profile

7Eleven Inc Attn Ad Valorem Tax 7Eleven Store 40588

on the county rolls as 7ELEVEN INC ATTN AD VALOREM TAX 7ELEVEN STORE 40588 · mail to PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221No Texas filing under this name

$15,889,005Market value

10Properties

6,776Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$15,889,005total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$1,526,914median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bastrop 3, Bexar 3, Comal 2, Guadalupe 1, Medina 1
ZIPs: 78070, 78132, 78155, 78207, 78220, 78222, 78602, 78612, 78621, 78850
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 17602
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 17098

Source: 5 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000001248894	4038 E HOUSTON SAN ANTONIO 78220	bexar	$2,720,000	0	not on the roll	17546
000000125417	201 W US 290 ELGIN 78621	bastrop	$2,243,158	0	not on the roll	17567
000000024962	9100 FM 306 NEW BRAUNFELS 78132	comal	$1,794,763	0	not on the roll	17554
000000116422	2728 N AUSTIN SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$1,690,000	6,776	2016	17547
000000036601	901 SH 95 BASTROP 78602	bastrop	$1,528,829	0	not on the roll	17567
000000464269	3054 RIGSBY AVE SAN ANTONIO 78222	bexar	$1,525,000	0	not on the roll	17225
000001289126	2607 BUENA VISTA SAN ANTONIO 78207	bexar	$1,380,000	0	not on the roll	17098
000000022669	1525 W SH 71 CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$1,246,275	0	not on the roll	17567
000000107437	174 STAR GRASS SPRING BRANCH 78070	comal	$1,148,760	0	not on the roll	17602
000000051585	6919 HWY 90 W DHANIS 78850	medina	$612,220	0	not on the roll	17554
10 properties			$15,889,005	6,776

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered