Landlord profile

Lantana Progressive, Llc

Filed as LANTANA PROGRESSIVE, LLC · taxpayer 32072477865 · on the county rolls as LANTANA PROGRESSIVE LLC · mail to 2105 REMINGTON AVE EDINBURG TX 78539Matched to a Texas filing
$8,758,809Market value
11Properties
35,902Sq ft living area
≈8Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

8 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈8units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$8,758,809total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$344,020median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Atascosa 8, Bexar 2, Guadalupe 1
ZIPs
78011, 78026, 78064, 78219, 78648
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20010
Earliest purchase date on the roll
14852

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
LANTANA PROGRESSIVE, LLC
Name we searched
LANTANA PROGRESSIVE LLC
Taxpayer number
32072477865
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2019-11-07
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0803464946
Registered agent
CARLOS A GARZA
Filing mailing address
2105 REMINGTON AVE EDINBURG TX 78539

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 8 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000056684E IH 10 LULING 78648guadalupe$3,097,2998,880201917996
0000001889073220 ZANDERSON AVE CAMPBELLTON 78011atascosa$2,318,92019,174201516561
0000004593983978 N PANAM EXPY SAN ANTONIO 78219bexar$800,0000not on the roll14852
000000017622CORGEY IH 37 PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$650,2500not on the roll19545
0000000129504463 E HWY 97 PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$579,0000not on the roll19545
0000000129464460 E SH 97 PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$344,0202,520198019180
0000001936333220 ZANDERSON AVE JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$329,9100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000189912CHRISTINE 78011atascosa$242,5500not on the roll16561
0000000129484460 E SH 97 PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$197,7805,328197019180
000000017145HWY 97 IH 37 JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$184,9400not on the roll20010
0000012164603978 N PANAM EXPY SAN ANTONIO 78219bexar$14,1400not on the rollnot on the roll
11 properties$8,758,80935,902

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director
SANDRA GARZA
Manager
SANDRA GARZA
Member
SANDRA GARZA
Vice Pres
SANDRA GARZA

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered