PEREZ EDUARDO

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as PEREZ EDUARDO · mail to 12752 SAINT MARY DR MANOR TX 78653No Texas filing under this name

$4,708,759Market value

10Properties

31,602Sq ft living area

≈26Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈26units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$4,708,759total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$328,040median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 7, Travis 1, Williamson 1, Hays 1
ZIPs: 78226, 78227, 78230, 78244, 78249, 78253, 78260, 78640, 78641, 78653
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 1 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 5 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2021-04-28
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 14778

Source: 4 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
711140	12752 ST MARY DR AUSTIN TX 78653	travis	$197,141	1,036	2005	2021-04-28
000000204121	12102 GWENDOLEN DR SAN ANTONIO 78253	bexar	$230,000	1,448	1988	16311
000000993781	5002 ARIZONA BAY SAN ANTONIO 78244	bexar	$238,540	1,639	2005	14778
000000578462	8438 ADAMS HILL DR SAN ANTONIO 78227	bexar	$250,250	2,054	2004	19013
000000629970	3479 RIVER N DR SAN ANTONIO 78230	bexar	$297,250	1,431	1982	16035
103600	627 BOTTLE BRUSH DR KYLE TX 78640	hays	$358,830	2,455	2013	not on the roll
257353	604 RED BUD CV LEANDER TX 78641	williamson	$370,668	2,473	2007.000000	17862
000001016816	25502 GOLD YARROW SAN ANTONIO 78260	bexar	$420,400	3,134	2005	19216
000001300126	12706 FAIRVIEW FARMS SAN ANTONIO 78249	bexar	$535,050	2,812	2019	18250
000001106254	3326 WEIR AVE SAN ANTONIO 78226	bexar	$1,810,630	13,120	2007	16115
10 properties			$4,708,759	31,602

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered