Landlord profile

Snowmass Inc A Texas Corporation

on the county rolls as SNOWMASS INC A TEXAS CORPORATION · mail to PO BOX 55287 HOUSTON TX 77255No Texas filing under this name
$3,230,770Market value
11Properties
396Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,230,770total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$94,930median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bandera 11
ZIPs
78003, 78055, 78063
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
17484
Earliest purchase date on the roll
11096

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000001412432501 FM 2828 BANDERA 78003bandera$1,1300not on the roll11150
0000001735211193 FM 2828 LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$8,0000not on the roll11096
000000170602BENTON CREEK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$12,1400not on the roll16638
0000001735111193 FM 2828 LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$19,9600not on the roll11096
000000170601BENTON CREEK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$76,670396016638
000000170600BENTON CREEK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$94,9300not on the roll16638
0000001714502247 FM 2828 MEDINA 78055bandera$206,1000not on the roll17484
000000170592BENTON CREEK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$520,9800not on the roll16638
0000001735101193 FM 2828 LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$532,8400not on the roll11096
000000170591BENTON CREEK RD MEDINA 78055bandera$676,0000not on the roll16638
000000155068C R MOORE RD BANDERA 78003bandera$1,082,0200not on the roll16420
11 properties$3,230,770396

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered