813 PROPERTIES LLC

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as 813 PROPERTIES LLC · mail to 1219 VICTORIA ST 1 LAREDO TX 78040Our registry lookup was rejected

$1,705,000Market value

10Properties

9,153Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,705,000total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$132,500median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 10
ZIPs: 78204, 78223, 78228
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 18750
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 14994

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000133472	307 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$55,000	400	1923	17641
000000133471	305 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$110,000	360	1940	17641
000000133542	323 E LACHAPELLE SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$115,000	507	1932	16507
000000133543	327 E LACHAPELLE SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$125,000	656	1932	16664
000000396835	129 AVONDALE AVE SAN ANTONIO 78223	bexar	$130,000	1,340	1920	14994
000000414625	1957 DONALDSON AVE SAN ANTONIO 78228	bexar	$135,000	1,000	1960	15008
000000133524	208 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$215,000	920	1960	17325
000000133453	211 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$250,000	1,168	1920	15008
000000133519	114 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$270,000	1,229	1922	18750
000000133528	220 E FEST ST SAN ANTONIO 78204	bexar	$300,000	1,573	1925	16790
10 properties			$1,705,000	9,153

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered