Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

Filed as SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · taxpayer 10106276719 · on the county rolls as SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP · mail to 1 ROCKET RD HAWTHORNE CA 90250Matched to a Texas filing
$406,546,250Market value
9Properties
3,957Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

9parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$406,546,250total market value

County roll value across all 9 parcels

$938,164median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bastrop 9
ZIPs
78602, 78621, 78650, 78957
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
9 of 9
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 9
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19881
Earliest purchase date on the roll
19146

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Name we searched
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP
Taxpayer number
10106276719
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2024-02-15
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0805421124
Registered agent
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCO
Filing mailing address
1 ROCKET RD HAWTHORNE CA 90250

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

9 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000008734540ELGIN 78621bastrop$48,3700not on the roll19549
000008728860BASTROP 78602bastrop$210,3060not on the roll19263
000000069963MCDADE 78650bastrop$289,3290not on the roll19881
000000053987SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$303,2550not on the roll19878
000000035975888 FM 1209 BASTROP 78602bastrop$938,1643,957198819640
000000036088816 FM 1209 BASTROP 78602bastrop$1,510,1330not on the roll19881
000000108531BASTROP 78602bastrop$55,870,2020not on the roll19146
000008733512BASTROP 78602bastrop$68,455,2840not on the rollnot on the roll
000008733511BASTROP 78602bastrop$278,921,2070not on the rollnot on the roll
9 properties$406,546,2503,957

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

One link was withheld. The registered agent on this filing, Corporation Service Company Dba Csc Lawyers Inco, appears on 152 other filings here. At that scale it is a hub, not a relationship, so it is reported as a count instead of drawn as lines

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered