DADI INVESTMENTS LLC ANTONIO PEDRAZA JR PC

Landlord profile

Dadi Investments Llc Antonio Pedraza Jr Pc

on the county rolls as DADI INVESTMENTS LLC ANTONIO PEDRAZA JR PC · mail to 3519 PAESANOS PKWY 105 SAN ANTONIO TX 78231No Texas filing under this name

$3,702,610Market value

10Properties

17,698Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,702,610total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$249,500median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 10
ZIPs: 78109, 78201, 78209, 78222, 78245, 78251, 78254, 78258
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 18239
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 14763

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000001063435	6023 LAKE VICTORIA ST SAN ANTONIO 78222	bexar	$197,000	1,368	2006	17926
000000234613	7942 DUELING OAK SAN ANTONIO 78254	bexar	$224,000	1,698	2000	15961
000001048659	11815 BRIARTON PASS SAN ANTONIO 78254	bexar	$227,000	1,672	2005	15961
000000701467	9419 FALL PASS ST SAN ANTONIO 78251	bexar	$235,000	1,752	2004	16657
000000996179	651 RATTLER BLF SAN ANTONIO 78251	bexar	$249,000	1,751	2004	17021
000000990535	9526 ANDERSON WY CONVERSE 78109	bexar	$250,000	2,252	2005	18165
000001062248	1126 SUNDANCE FT SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$269,000	2,018	2009	15964
000001127261	8250 CRUISESHIP BAY 402 SAN ANTONIO 78201	bexar	$368,340	2,164	2008	14763
000000734828	19123 HEATHER CRK SAN ANTONIO 78258	bexar	$595,000	3,023	1998	15537
000000493825	318 W SUNSET RD SAN ANTONIO 78209	bexar	$1,088,270	0	not on the roll	18239
10 properties			$3,702,610	17,698

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered