Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Lake Medina Shores Owners Association

Filed as LAKE MEDINA SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION · taxpayer 17522092984 · on the county rolls as LAKE MEDINA SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION · mail to 7100 WHARTONS DOCK RD BANDERA TX 78003Matched to a Texas filing
$307,800Market value
25Properties
2,630Sq ft living area
≈19Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

25parcels on the rolls

19 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈19units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$307,800total market value

County roll value across all 25 parcels

$7,220median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bandera 25
ZIPs
78055, 78063
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 25
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 25
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20077
Earliest purchase date on the roll
20077

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
LAKE MEDINA SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Name we searched
LAKE MEDINA SHORES OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Taxpayer number
17522092984
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1988-01-20
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0105312401
Registered agent
KENNETH A HAGEN
Filing mailing address
1 POOL WHARTON DOCK RD BANDERA TX 78003

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 18 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

25 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000159082PARK LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$7700not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159081WHARTONSCASTROVIL LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$1,3700not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159051LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$1,8100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159059WHARTONS DOCK LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$1,8400not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159072CANYON LAKE LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$2,0400not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159077BANDERA LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$2,5800not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159074BANDERA LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$3,2500not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159075BANDERA LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$3,3300not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159066BLANCO NACOMA LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$3,6500not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159080LAKESHORE DR LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$3,6700not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159052348 SCENIC DR LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$3,7600not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159062LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$6,7500not on the rollnot on the roll
000000148487JUNCTION LAKEHILLS 78055bandera$7,2200not on the roll20077
000000159070LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$11,2900not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159068LAKESIDE DR LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$11,7402,3601970not on the roll
000000159079BRUSHY CREEK LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$13,4300not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159055WHARTONS DOCK LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$15,5002702000not on the roll
000000159089PARK LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$17,8100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159083LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$18,1100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159073LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$21,6800not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159063LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$25,7900not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159061LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$26,1000not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159064LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$27,9000not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159088LAKESHORE DR LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$31,9500not on the rollnot on the roll
000000159058LAKEHILLS 78063bandera$44,4600not on the rollnot on the roll
25 properties$307,8002,630

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered