Landlord profile

Halle Properties Llc

on the county rolls as HALLE PROPERTIES LLC · mail to 20225 N SCOTTSDALE RD DEPT 1100 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255Our registry lookup was rejected
$31,669,045Market value
13Properties
23,827Sq ft living area
≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$31,669,045total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$2,363,962median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7, Travis 2, Comal 2, Bastrop 1, Guadalupe 1
ZIPs
78070, 78154, 78216, 78217, 78227, 78244, 78245, 78249, 78253, 78602, 78732, 78736
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
13 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
2021-09-03
Earliest purchase date on the roll
12622

Source: 5 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
3152998023 ROSSON DR TX 78736travis$3,650,7737,95520242021-09-03
0000013051595502 SW 410 SAN ANTONIO 78227bexar$3,450,0000not on the roll18115
00000128697913503 NACOGDOCHES RD SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$3,425,0000not on the roll17332
00000117963014822 BLANCO RD SAN ANTONIO 78216bexar$3,275,0000not on the roll15583
0000011387474439 W LOOP 1604 SAN ANTONIO 78249bexar$3,250,0000not on the roll14466
0000012675437619 FM 78 SAN ANTONIO 78244bexar$3,175,0000not on the rollnot on the roll
973563N F M RD 620 AUSTIN TX 78732travis$2,363,9628,1922020not on the roll
000001317635243 W LOOP 1604 S SAN ANTONIO 78245bexar$2,050,0000not on the roll18542
000001378280CULEBRA RD SAN ANTONIO 78253bexar$1,929,8100not on the roll19305
000000391819366 SINGING OAKS SPRING BRANCH 78070comal$1,689,4200not on the roll17063
0000001219826708 GUADA COMA DR SCHERTZ 78154comal$1,310,4200not on the roll14169
000000097464716 W SH 71 BASTROP 78602bastrop$1,089,6600not on the roll12622
00000016961717971 N IH 35 SCHERTZ 78154guadalupe$1,010,0007,680202017737
13 properties$31,669,04523,827

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered