Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Gene Doris Sampson Trust 7113

on the county rolls as GENE DORIS SAMPSON TRUST 7113 · mail to DORIS SAMPSON TRUE PO BOX 243 SMITHVILLE TX 78957No Texas filing under this name
$3,024,506Market value
13Properties
644Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,024,506total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$176,738median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bastrop 13
ZIPs
78602, 78612, 78650, 78659, 78662, 78957
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
16703
Earliest purchase date on the roll
15887

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000108632RED ROCK 78662bastrop$548,1000not on the roll15887
000000122615MCDADE 78650bastrop$501,0070not on the roll15887
000000133713545 MT OLIVE RD CEDAR CREEK 78612bastrop$419,9000not on the roll16703
000000055926BASTROP 78602bastrop$316,9040not on the roll15887
000000038391CEDAR CREEK 78612bastrop$298,7350not on the roll15887
000000037432PAIGE 78659bastrop$176,7380not on the roll15887
000000042284RED ROCK 78662bastrop$176,7380not on the roll16573
000000076935CEDAR CREEK 78612bastrop$167,7970not on the roll15887
000000024084CEDAR CREEK 78612bastrop$147,3860not on the roll16573
000000042982BASTROP 78602bastrop$147,3860not on the roll15887
000000021560SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$79,5680not on the roll15887
000000021466502 GAZLEY SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$34,3040not on the roll15887
000000127810706 HARPER ST B SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$9,9436442014not on the roll
13 properties$3,024,506644

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered