Diamond Corporate Services Inc
Filed as DIAMOND CORPORATE SERVICES INC · taxpayer 30114540500 · on the county rolls as DIAMOND CORPORATE SERVICES INC · mail to PO BOX 90009 AUSTIN TX 78709Matched to a Texas filingThe unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated
Portfolio totals
- County spread
- Hays 2
- ZIPs
- 78620
- Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
- 0 of 2
- Parcels flagged owner-occupied
- 0 of 2
- Most recent purchase date on the roll
- not on the roll
- Earliest purchase date on the roll
- not on the roll
Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates
Download this portfolio as CSV
The Texas business filing behind this name
- Filing we matched
- DIAMOND CORPORATE SERVICES INC
- Name we searched
- DIAMOND CORPORATE SERVICES INC
- Taxpayer number
- 30114540500
- Right to transact business
- FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
- Secretary of State status
- INACTIVE
- Effective registration
- 1991-01-23
- State of formation
- TX
- Texas SOS file number
- 0117951000
- Registered agent
- JOANNES G FRANKEN
- Filing mailing address
- 4619 SPYGLASS DRIVE DALLAS TX 75287
Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 2 registry rows carry this owner
Every property on the rolls under this owner
| Parcel ID | Address | County | Market value ↓ | Sq ft | Built | Acquired |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54760 | 32735 N RR 12 DRIPPING SPRINGS TX 78620 | hays | $677,444 | 2,772 | 2002 | not on the roll |
| 54761 | 32701 RANCH RD 12 DRIPPING SPRINGS TX 78620 | hays | $659,359 | 2,698 | 2002 | not on the roll |
| 2 properties | $1,336,803 | 5,470 | ||||
Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026
Companies linked to this one
Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank
The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud
Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen
Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies