MATEJORA ENTERPRISES CO NY LTD

Landlord profile

Matejora Enterprises Co Ny Ltd

on the county rolls as MATEJORA ENTERPRISES CO NY LTD · mail to PO BOX 27375 AUSTIN TX 78755No Texas filing under this name

$6,114,973Market value

9Properties

25,922Sq ft living area

≈16Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

9parcels on the rolls

9 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈16units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$6,114,973total market value

County roll value across all 9 parcels

$687,862median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Travis 6, Hays 3
ZIPs: 78735, 78737, 78739, 78749
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 9
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 9
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2016-05-25
Earliest purchase date on the roll: -715035

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 9 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

9 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
94880	132 PURE BROOK WY AUSTIN TX 78737	hays	$833,625	3,836	2008	-718413
484892	9605 PRESCOTT DR AUSTIN TX 78749	travis	$779,345	3,588	2000	2013-08-23
831156	6812 VITRUVIUS DR AUSTIN 78739	travis	$716,203	2,515	2014	2015-01-30
340376	10604 REDMOND RD AUSTIN TX 78739	travis	$702,147	2,619	1993	2016-05-25
520900	5829 MEDICINE CREEK DR AUSTIN TX 78735	travis	$687,862	2,637	2002	2016-05-23
97552	171 CRAMPTON CV AUSTIN TX 78737	hays	$668,401	3,057	2011	not on the roll
717439	12012 CHERISSE DR AUSTIN 78739	travis	$606,400	2,843	2006	2016-05-16
752033	11016 CHERISSE DR AUSTIN TX 78739	travis	$592,527	2,284	2011	2015-06-16
95375	307 ELDERBERRY RD AUSTIN TX 78737	hays	$528,463	2,543	2012	-715035
9 properties			$6,114,973	25,922

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered