RAILPRESS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Landlord profile

Railpress Family Limited Partnership

Filed as RAILPRESS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP · taxpayer 32035048860 · on the county rolls as RAUL S CANTU FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 4 · mail to 8546 BRDWY ST 234 SAN ANTONIO TX 78217Matched to a Texas filing

$7,562,240Market value

5Properties

3,177Sq ft living area

≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

5parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$7,562,240total market value

County roll value across all 5 parcels

$342,240median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 5
ZIPs: 78223, 78224, 78247
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 5
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 5
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 16405
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 13669

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: RAILPRESS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Name we searched: RAUL S CANTU FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 4
Taxpayer number: 32035048860
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2007-03-05
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0800783953
Registered agent: RAUL CANTU
Filing mailing address: 314 E NAKOMA ST STE K SAN ANTONIO TX 78216

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

5 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000001233779	8815 POTEET JOURDANTON FWY SAN ANTONIO 78224	bexar	$4,000,000	0	not on the roll	16405
000001233778	8731 POTEET JOURDANTON SAN ANTONIO 78224	bexar	$2,845,000	0	not on the roll	16405
000001233780	PALO ALTO SAN ANTONIO 78224	bexar	$342,240	0	not on the roll	16405
000000678288	3518 OAKHEATH SAN ANTONIO 78247	bexar	$275,000	1,941	1979	13669
000000396767	502 MOUNT VERNON CT SAN ANTONIO 78223	bexar	$100,000	1,236	1938	not on the roll
5 properties			$7,562,240	3,177

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

General Pa: AUGUSTIN MARTINEZ

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered