Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Brandt Real Estate Holdings, Llc

Filed as BRANDT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC · taxpayer 32063627502 · on the county rolls as BRANDT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC · mail to PO BOX 541 LA VERNIA TX 78121Matched to a Texas filing
$1,975,178Market value
12Properties
13,045Sq ft living area
≈12Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

12 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈12units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,975,178total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$112,005median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Wilson 9, Guadalupe 2, Bexar 1
ZIPs
78114, 78121, 78155, 78233
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
7 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll
20122
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17669

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
BRANDT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC
Name we searched
BRANDT REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
Taxpayer number
32063627502
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2017-05-02
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0802711933
Registered agent
MINDY BRANDT
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 541 LA VERNIA TX 78121

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 12 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000000702856785 FM 775 SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$714,9433,102200018285
00000029893111909 SMOKING OAKS ST LIVE OAK 78233bexar$237,2002,003197420122
000020125042117 PULLMAN RD LA VERNIA 78121wilson$171,7801,456018064
0000201238542175 CR 128 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$119,4900not on the roll17912
00000005502642 POST OAK RD A LA VERNIA 78121wilson$116,020784199317669
00002013467419 POST OAK RD A LA VERNIA 78121wilson$112,8101,0640not on the roll
0000201347262175 CR 128 B FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$111,2001,2922016not on the roll
0000201347252175 CR 128 A FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$107,5181,2162017not on the roll
00002012631819 POST OAK RD B LA VERNIA 78121wilson$95,2401,0640not on the roll
00002012417842 POST OAK RD B LA VERNIA 78121wilson$89,8301,0642018not on the roll
00000004039619 POST OAK RD LA VERNIA 78121wilson$50,9700not on the roll18064
0000000702866785 FM 775 SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$48,1770not on the roll18285
12 properties$1,975,17813,045

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Managing M
MINDY BRANDT

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered