Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Panda Properties, L.L.C.

Filed as PANDA PROPERTIES, L.L.C. · taxpayer 30117936507 · on the county rolls as PANDA PROPERTIES LLC · mail to PO BOX 233 GIDDINGS TX 78942Matched to a Texas filing
$1,153,967Market value
13Properties
8,144Sq ft living area
≈11Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

11 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈11units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,153,967total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$66,083median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bastrop 13
ZIPs
78650, 78659, 78953, 78957
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18421
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17361

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
PANDA PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
Name we searched
PANDA PROPERTIES LLC
Taxpayer number
30117936507
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
1995-08-07
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0701330222
Registered agent
MARTY ENGLANDER
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 22067 WACO TX 76702

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 11 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000001131622548 E US 290 MCDADE 78650bastrop$189,5272,128199617361
0000000591481281 OLD HWY 20 A MCDADE 78650bastrop$164,2860not on the roll17361
000000021697118 COMMANCHE DR SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$151,5871,008198017361
000000058685134 PINE VALLEY CT PAIGE 78659bastrop$141,3960not on the roll17648
000000021679121 APACHE LN SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$111,347896199617361
000000019909184 BUFFALO RUN SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$78,5091,216199417361
000000016166174 COMMANCHE DR SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$66,083784199718421
000000016577120 CHOCTAW TRL DR SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$57,6420not on the roll17361
000000021513125 IROQUOIS DR SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$50,450896199717361
000000041582184 BUFFALO RUN SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$49,3271,216199417361
000000021676SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$43,1400not on the roll17980
000000019906ROSANKY 78953bastrop$28,4180not on the roll17361
000000019912SMITHVILLE 78957bastrop$22,2550not on the roll17361
13 properties$1,153,9678,144

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director
MARTY ENGLANDER

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered