CREEKMORE INVESTMENTS INC

Landlord profile

Filed as CREEKMORE INVESTMENTS INC · taxpayer 17510927696 · on the county rolls as CREEKMORE INVESTMENTS LLC · mail to 1281 CR 410 COMANCHE TX 76442Matched to a Texas filing

$3,372,751Market value

6Properties

5,056Sq ft living area

≈4Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

6parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈4units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,372,751total market value

County roll value across all 6 parcels

$163,565median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Comal 6
ZIPs: 78132, 78133, 78163
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 6
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 6
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 18799
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 17864

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: CREEKMORE INVESTMENTS INC
Name we searched: CREEKMORE INVESTMENTS LLC
Taxpayer number: 17510927696
Right to transact business: FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status: INACTIVE
Effective registration: 1956-10-10
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0013564100
Registered agent: THELMA CREEKMORE
Filing mailing address: PO BOX 8000 %NATL BANK TEXARKANA TX 75504

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

6 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000407914	23297 FM 306 CANYON LAKE 78133	comal	$2,296,581	0	not on the roll	18558
000000439497	BULVERDE 78163	comal	$539,060	0	not on the roll	18558
000000062306	1123 HEDGESTONE CANYON LAKE 78133	comal	$165,660	1,344	2021	18799
000000062353	1113 RAMBLE HILLS CANYON LAKE 78133	comal	$161,470	1,536	2021	18799
000000062335	1152 RAMBLE HILLS CANYON LAKE 78133	comal	$105,280	1,088	2016	17864
000000062336	1138 RAMBLE HILLS CANYON LAKE 78132	comal	$104,700	1,088	2016	17864
6 properties			$3,372,751	5,056

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered