10000 LAMAR LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as 10000 LAMAR LLC · taxpayer 32063063773 · on the county rolls as 10000 LAMAR LLC · mail to 6300 BRIDGE PT PKWY 3300 AUSTIN TX 78730Matched to a Texas filing

$318,802,370Market value

12Properties

2,515,270Sq ft living area

≈2,796Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

11 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈2,796units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$318,802,370total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$32,375,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 10, Travis 2
ZIPs: 78213, 78229, 78238, 78240, 78249, 78250, 78741, NA
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2026-03-19
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 18248

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: 10000 LAMAR LLC
Name we searched: 10000 LAMAR LLC
Taxpayer number: 32063063773
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2017-03-03
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0802664555
Registered agent: KALISER ASSOCIATES PC
Filing mailing address: 6300 BRIDGE POINT PKWY STE 3-300 AUSTIN TX 78730

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 11 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
249170	10000 N LAMAR BLVD AUSTIN TX	travis	$45,172,000	261,916	1983	2026-03-19
000000607186	11501 BRAESVIEW SAN ANTONIO 78213	bexar	$38,500,000	398,043	1980	18248
000000218922	5622 EVERS RD SAN ANTONIO 78238	bexar	$37,000,000	337,746	1979	18737
287613	1817 E OLTORF ST AUSTIN TX 78741	travis	$35,170,000	183,840	1973	2018-04-19
000000609219	1200 PATRICIA SAN ANTONIO 78213	bexar	$33,000,000	267,854	1982	18670
000001061161	8711 BOWENS CROSSING ST SAN ANTONIO 78250	bexar	$32,750,000	226,416	2006	18369
000001075964	6710 BABCOCK RD SAN ANTONIO 78249	bexar	$32,000,000	226,545	2007	18821
000000614750	4041 MEDICAL DR SAN ANTONIO 78229	bexar	$25,000,000	293,688	1982	18516
000000609233	1401 PATRICIA SAN ANTONIO 78213	bexar	$21,750,000	168,312	1981	18971
000000617268	4900 USAA BLVD SAN ANTONIO 78240	bexar	$18,000,000	150,910	1984	18516
000001167630	BABCOCK RD SAN ANTONIO 78249	bexar	$244,640	0	not on the roll	18821
000001061787	N LOOP 1604 SAN ANTONIO 78250	bexar	$215,730	0	not on the roll	18365
12 properties			$318,802,370	2,515,270

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director: DAVID SHIPPY
Managing M: DAVID SHIPPY
Member: DAVID SHIPPY

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

This shows one entity and what sits up to two links away from it. Every line is labelled with the reason for it, because the reason is the claim

2 more first-hop companies were left out to keep this readable. The strongest links are drawn first

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,386 owners of the 71,641 inside the coverage rules, 35.4% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,841 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,414 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,641 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered