Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

San Antonio Water Sym Manager Corporate Real Estate

on the county rolls as SAN ANTONIO WATER SYM MANAGER CORPORATE REAL ESTATE · mail to PO BOX 2449 SAN ANTONIO TX 78298Our registry lookup was rejected
$2,837,191Market value
10Properties
0Sq ft living area
≈3Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

3 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈3units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,837,191total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$214,590median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Atascosa 7, Bexar 2, Wilson 1
ZIPs
78050, 78052, 78064, 78114, 78251, 78256
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll
13868
Earliest purchase date on the roll
11114

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 3 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000013144FM 536 LYTLE 78052atascosa$758,9500not on the roll11114
000000015199I 37 LEMING 78050atascosa$625,8500not on the roll11114
000000015828FM 536 PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$488,4800not on the roll11114
000000015201I 37 LEMING 78050atascosa$297,4800not on the roll13868
000000066686I 37 JOURDANTON 78064atascosa$221,8800not on the roll13868
000000066687IH 37 JOURDANTON 78064atascosa$207,3000not on the roll13868
000000018415FM 536 NATALIA 78052atascosa$182,0500not on the roll11114
000001133857SAN ANTONIO 78251bexar$31,8650not on the rollnot on the roll
000001193373SAN ANTONIO 78256bexar$17,8970not on the rollnot on the roll
000000069169FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$5,4390not on the rollnot on the roll
10 properties$2,837,1910

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered