MURPHY OIL USA INC

Landlord profile

Filed as MURPHY OIL USA INC · taxpayer 17160536151 · on the county rolls as MURPHY OIL USA INC · mail to 200 E PEACH ST EL DORADO AR 71730Matched to a Texas filing

$9,240,210Market value

10Properties

3,108Sq ft living area

≈4Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈4units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$9,240,210total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$759,793median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Travis 5, Guadalupe 2, Bastrop 1, Caldwell 1, Comal 1
ZIPs: 78130, 78154, 78155, 78602, 78644, 78660, 78704, 78753, NA
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 10 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2008-07-22
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 13907

Source: 5 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: MURPHY OIL USA INC
Name we searched: MURPHY OIL USA INC
Taxpayer number: 17160536151
Right to transact business: FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status: INACTIVE
Effective registration: 1963-08-21
State of formation: DE
Texas SOS file number: 0002319006
Registered agent: CT CORPORATION SYM
Filing mailing address: 200 W PEACH ST %BOBBY EDMONDS EL DORADO AR 71730

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
774272	710 E BEN WHITE BLVD AUSTIN TX 78704	travis	$3,185,848	588	2005	2008-07-14
773468	1700 F M RD 685 AUSTIN TX 78660	travis	$1,243,193	616	2007	2008-04-29
000000133652	490 AGNES ST BASTROP 78602	bastrop	$959,454	0	not on the roll	16636
771916	1030 RUTHERFORD LN AUSTIN TX 78753	travis	$851,683	161	2003	2008-07-20
771916	RUTHERFORD LN AUSTIN TX	travis	$851,683	161	2003	2008-07-20
000000134190	6102 FM 3009 SCHERTZ 78154	guadalupe	$667,904	1,260	2018	13990
775222	13000 N IH HY 35 AUSTIN TX 78753	travis	$620,013	168	2003	2008-07-22
000000153711	1026 WALNUT AVE NEW BRAUNFELS 78130	comal	$425,320	0	not on the roll	13907
000000101655	1910 S COLORADO ST LOCKHART 78644	caldwell	$304,430	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000134211	1398 EWOOD DR SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$130,682	154	2000	13998
10 properties			$9,240,210	3,108

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

One link was withheld. The registered agent on this filing, Ct Corporation Sym, appears on 122 other filings here. At that scale it is a hub, not a relationship, so it is reported as a count instead of drawn as lines

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered