JOHNSON ULYSSES 5406 E MARTIN LUTHER KING

Landlord profile

Johnson Ulysses 5406 E Martin Luther King

on the county rolls as JOHNSON ULYSSES 5406 E MARTIN LUTHER KING · mail to AUSTIN TX 78721No Texas filing under this name

$1,190,732Market value

9Properties

1,060Sq ft living area

≈3Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

9parcels on the rolls

3 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈3units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,190,732total market value

County roll value across all 9 parcels

$60,982median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bastrop 9
ZIPs: 78602, 78612, 78616, 78662
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 9
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 9
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 9972
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 10325

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 3 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

9 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000044886	RED ROCK 78662	bastrop	$420,287	0	not on the roll	9191
000000062885	CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$365,874	0	not on the roll	10325
000000062880	CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$101,815	0	not on the roll	9748
000000029190	1390 W SH 71 BASTROP 78602	bastrop	$72,176	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000062884	CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$60,982	0	not on the roll	9191
000000062882	CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$60,980	0	not on the roll	9912
000000062883	CEDAR CREEK 78612	bastrop	$60,980	0	not on the roll	9972
000008719418	1392 SH 71 W BASTROP 78602	bastrop	$42,169	560	2016	not on the roll
000008712490	DALE 78616	bastrop	$5,469	500	1984	not on the roll
9 properties			$1,190,732	1,060

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered