Landlord profile

Skipper Beverage Company, Llc

Filed as SKIPPER BEVERAGE COMPANY, LLC · taxpayer 17421065883 · on the county rolls as SKIPPER BEVERAGE COMPANY INC · mail to PO BOX 52085 DC17 PHOENIX AZ 85072Matched to a Texas filing
$8,529,407Market value
9Properties
25,837Sq ft living area
≈4Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

9parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈4units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$8,529,407total market value

County roll value across all 9 parcels

$826,873median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Travis 5, Guadalupe 3, Bexar 1
ZIPs
78130, 78154, 78216, 78744, 78748, 78753, 78758
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
9 of 9
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 9
Most recent purchase date on the roll
2010-04-01
Earliest purchase date on the roll
14457

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
SKIPPER BEVERAGE COMPANY, LLC
Name we searched
SKIPPER BEVERAGE COMPANY INC
Taxpayer number
17421065883
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2013-04-30
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0801775215
Registered agent
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCO
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 52085 ATTN INCOME TAX DC-60 PHOENIX AZ 85072

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

9 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000000388283063 FM 725 NEW BRAUNFELS 78130guadalupe$453,5542,600198614641
000000034104IH 35 SCHERTZ 78154guadalupe$581,0130not on the roll14457
2490331211 RUTLAND DR AUSTIN TX 78758travis$730,5353,36719782009-08-01
2490339433 PARKFIELD DR AUSTIN TX 78758travis$730,5353,36719782009-08-01
2937814602 E STASSNEY LN AUSTIN TX 78744travis$826,8733,04419862010-04-01
00000003410217599 N IH 35 SCHERTZ 78154guadalupe$1,136,7813,459198414457
243468933 E RUNDBERG LN AUSTIN TX 78753travis$1,149,1286,84019832010-02-01
3426763419 W SLAUGHTER LN AUSTIN TX 78748travis$1,298,7383,16019862009-08-01
000000496477841 E BITTERS RD SAN ANTONIO 78216bexar$1,622,2500not on the roll14636
9 properties$8,529,40725,837

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Vice President Operations Rocky Mountain
MARK TATE

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

SHARED MAILING ADDRESSSKIPPER BEVERAGECOMPANY, LLCMATCHED · $8,529,407 · 9 PROPERTIESN2I ONE, LLCMATCHED · $3,475,560 · 1 PROPERTIES
Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

This shows one entity and what sits up to two links away from it. Every line is labelled with the reason for it, because the reason is the claim

One link was withheld. The registered agent on this filing, Corporation Service Company Dba Csclawyers Inco, appears on 248 other filings here. At that scale it is a hub, not a relationship, so it is reported as a count instead of drawn as lines

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered