Landlord profile

Alpha Rental Properties Lp

on the county rolls as ALPHA RENTAL PROPERTIES LP · mail to 7887 BRDWY ST 405 SAN ANTONIO TX 78209No Texas filing under this name
$1,436,100Market value
6Properties
10,028Sq ft living area
≈6Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

6parcels on the rolls

6 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈6units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,436,100total market value

County roll value across all 6 parcels

$228,500median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 6
ZIPs
78217, 78247, 78250, 78254
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 6
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 6
Most recent purchase date on the roll
16378
Earliest purchase date on the roll
14988

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 6 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

6 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000006597643423 RIDGE ASH SAN ANTONIO 78247bexar$299,0002,399200214988
00000023589910602 N SHAENRIDGE SAN ANTONIO 78254bexar$283,0001,921200416363
0000007055708914 SUMMER TRL SAN ANTONIO 78250bexar$251,0001,662200214988
00000098716811202 RANGER CAVERN SAN ANTONIO 78254bexar$206,0001,332200416378
00000060918413702 WINDING HILL SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$200,1001,357198414988
00000060918513706 WINDING HILL SAN ANTONIO 78217bexar$197,0001,357198414988
6 properties$1,436,10010,028

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered