LANDLORD MAPPER / AUSTIN DSA

Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Brookfield Residential Kissing Tree Llc

on the county rolls as BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL KISSING TREE LLC · mail to 9600 N MOPAC EXPY 750 AUSTIN TX 78759Our registry lookup was rejected
$1,297,933Market value
8Properties
16,253Sq ft living area
≈18Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

8parcels on the rolls

8 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈18units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,297,933total market value

County roll value across all 8 parcels

$93,593median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Hays 8
ZIPs
78666
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 8
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 8
Most recent purchase date on the roll
not on the roll
Earliest purchase date on the roll
not on the roll

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 7 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

8 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value ↓Sq ftBuiltAcquired
120951228 LIVING OAK CV SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$652,9352,8562021not on the roll
156437264 SWEEPING SAGE LN SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5932,1622024not on the roll
1565031532 DANCING OAK LN SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5932,1302024not on the roll
156524166 WAVING MUHILLY DR SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5931,7992024not on the roll
156525170 WAVING MUHILLY DR SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5932,6232024not on the roll
156529318 SWEEPING SAGE LN SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5931,4942024not on the roll
157954112 FIELD MINT CV SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$93,5931,5842024not on the roll
166324107 MACEO WY 102 SAN MARCOS TX 78666hays$83,4401,6052024not on the roll
8 properties$1,297,93316,253

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered