Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Columbia Realty Company

Filed as COLUMBIA REALTY COMPANY · taxpayer 17502023405 · on the county rolls as COLUMBIA REALTY LTD · mail to 5005 W AVE 100 SAN ANTONIO TX 78213Matched to a Texas filing
$11,471,420Market value
8Properties
0Sq ft living area
≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

8parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$11,471,420total market value

County roll value across all 8 parcels

$1,384,925median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 4, Wilson 4
ZIPs
78121, 78148, 78213, 78263
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 8
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 8
Most recent purchase date on the roll
8813
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17946

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
COLUMBIA REALTY COMPANY
Name we searched
COLUMBIA REALTY LTD
Taxpayer number
17502023405
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
1928-03-19
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0005072600
Registered agent
M E GREGORY
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 12001 DALLAS TX 75225

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

8 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000067503LA VERNIA 78121wilson$25,1900not on the roll18109
000001040223E LOOP 1604 N UNIVERSAL CITY 78148bexar$80,2400not on the rollnot on the roll
00000033655411110 NEW SULPHUR SPRINGS RD SAN ANTONIO 78263bexar$698,7500not on the roll17946
000000067509198 S FM 1346 LA VERNIA 78121wilson$1,136,2500not on the roll18109
000000067508102 S FM 1346 LA VERNIA 78121wilson$1,633,6000not on the roll18109
000000067502194 S FM 1346 LA VERNIA 78121wilson$1,669,1500not on the roll18765
000001059082E LOOP 1604 N UNIVERSAL CITY 78148bexar$2,329,2400not on the roll8813
0000005121515005 W AVE SAN ANTONIO 78213bexar$3,899,0000not on the rollnot on the roll
8 properties$11,471,4200

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered