Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Davenport John A Jr

on the county rolls as DAVENPORT JOHN A JR · mail to PO BOX 525 HALLETTSVILLE TX 77964No registry row for this owner
$7,468,586Market value
14Properties
9,919Sq ft living area
≈7Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

14parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈7units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$7,468,586total market value

County roll value across all 14 parcels

$250,570median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Caldwell 12, Guadalupe 2
ZIPs
78155, 78648
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 14
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 14
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18136
Earliest purchase date on the roll
11254

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

No registry row reached this owner

No usable registry row is on file for this name at all. Unknown, and drawn as a gap for that reason

This owner is in the not looked up state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 0 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

14 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000020300753LULING 78648caldwell$1220not on the rollnot on the roll
000020303740LULING 78648caldwell$7900not on the rollnot on the roll
000000074761SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$25,7420not on the rollnot on the roll
000000075563SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$41,5120not on the rollnot on the roll
000000022713SODA SPRINGS RD LULING 78648caldwell$48,2100not on the roll12783
0000000227654281 SALT FLAT RD LULING 78648caldwell$72,4302,520194017947
0000000465182231 SODA SPRINGS RD LULING 78648caldwell$210,4101,093191012510
000000022711MCNEIL RD LULING 78648caldwell$290,7300not on the roll12783
000000022710FM 1322 LULING 78648caldwell$390,3200not on the roll12783
00000002274313200 FM 1322 LULING 78648caldwell$1,034,300672197018136
000000022744MCNEIL RD LULING 78648caldwell$1,163,0000not on the roll15278
0000000227604519 SALT FLAT RD LULING 78648caldwell$1,230,6104,324193011254
0000000227122606 SODA SPRINGS RD LULING 78648caldwell$1,311,4501,310193812783
0000000227502299 SODA SPRINGS RD LULING 78648caldwell$1,648,9600not on the roll13081
14 properties$7,468,5869,919

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered