Landlord profile

Wetlands Management Gp, Llc

Filed as WETLANDS MANAGEMENT GP, LLC · taxpayer 32015528733 · on the county rolls as SAN ANTONIO RWI35 STORAGE LLC · mail to 2101 CEDAR SPRINGS RD 1600 DALLAS TX 75201 USMatched to a Texas filing
$169,894,040Market value
8Properties
1,038,307Sq ft living area
≈697Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

8parcels on the rolls

7 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈697units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$169,894,040total market value

County roll value across all 8 parcels

$13,487,090median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7, Guadalupe 1
ZIPs
78155, 78218, 78233, 78255
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
1 of 8
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 8
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18696
Earliest purchase date on the roll
16671

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
WETLANDS MANAGEMENT GP, LLC
Name we searched
SAN ANTONIO RWI35 STORAGE LLC
Taxpayer number
32015528733
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2004-08-02
State of formation
DE
Texas SOS file number
0800371857
Registered agent
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCO
Filing mailing address
2101 CEDAR SPRINGS RD STE 1600 DALLAS TX 75201

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 7 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

8 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000001400868OAKWELL CT SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$59,750,000359,5502022not on the roll
0000013041093310 OAKWELL CT SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$37,182,600157,7622019not on the roll
0000013075223310 OAKWELL CT SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$25,817,400106,139201917086
000001400870OAKWELL CT SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$16,119,960246,2460not on the roll
0000012342247363 W LOOP 1604 SAN ANTONIO 78255bexar$10,854,2200not on the roll16671
00000063996012211 N IH 35 SAN ANTONIO 78233bexar$10,108,8200not on the roll17676
00000018036017660 FOUR OAKS LN SCHERTZ 78155guadalupe$10,060,600168,610202218696
000000648549202 OAKWELL FARMS PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$4400not on the roll17932
8 properties$169,894,0401,038,307

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager
GREG BATES
Vp
WILSON L SANDS

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

One link was withheld. The registered agent on this filing, Corporation Service Company Dba Csclawyers Inco, appears on 248 other filings here. At that scale it is a hub, not a relationship, so it is reported as a count instead of drawn as lines

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,386 owners of the 71,641 inside the coverage rules, 35.4% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,841 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,414 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,641 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered