LANDLORD MAPPER / OPEN AUSTIN
Landlord profile

Palmernewman Rio Seco Ranch Lp

on the county rolls as PALMERNEWMAN RIO SECO RANCH LP · mail to 19552 SAND CASTLE DR SPICEWOOD TX 78669No Texas filing under this name
$9,291,390Market value
14Properties
8,331Sq ft living area
≈2Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

14parcels on the rolls

2 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈2units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$9,291,390total market value

County roll value across all 14 parcels

$562,110median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Medina 14
ZIPs
748861, 78009, 78056, 78057, 78059, 78861, 78884
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 14
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 14
Most recent purchase date on the roll
12040
Earliest purchase date on the roll
12040

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 2 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

14 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value ↓Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000010713CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$1,863,8900not on the roll12040
000000009922COUNTY RD MOORE 78057medina$1,295,7500not on the roll12040
000000012537CR 211 MICO 78056medina$1,154,1400not on the roll12040
000000008396CR 211 HONDO 748861medina$1,040,5600not on the roll12040
0000000644035850 CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$673,7904,6792000not on the roll
000000009240CR 211 UTOPIA 78884medina$628,2800not on the roll12040
000000001505CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$614,0400not on the roll12040
000000012635CR 211 HONDO 78861medina$510,1800not on the roll12040
000000012096CR 211 NATALIA 78059medina$498,3700not on the roll12040
000000001508CR 111 HONDO 78861medina$496,9000not on the roll12040
0000000520555686 CR 211 UTOPIA 78884medina$328,4103,652192512040
000000012542CR 211 MICO 78056medina$111,1000not on the roll12040
0000000092423231 CR 111 UTOPIA 78884medina$73,4700not on the roll12040
000000056462CASTROVILLE 78009medina$2,5100not on the roll12040
14 properties$9,291,3908,331

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered