DOYLECO INVESTMENTS, LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as DOYLECO INVESTMENTS, LLC · taxpayer 32060939561 · on the county rolls as DOYLECO INVESTMENTS LLC · mail to 1110 E QUINCY ST SAN ANTONIO TX 78212Matched to a Texas filing

$1,000,440Market value

5Properties

6,292Sq ft living area

≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

5parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,000,440total market value

County roll value across all 5 parcels

$192,950median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 5
ZIPs: 78109, 78209, 78232, 78245, 78252
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 5
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 1 of 5
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20270
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 18326

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: DOYLECO INVESTMENTS, LLC
Name we searched: DOYLECO INVESTMENTS LLC
Taxpayer number: 32060939561
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2016-06-30
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0802490881
Registered agent: JAMES LITTLEPAGE
Filing mailing address: 1110 E QUINCY ST SAN ANTONIO TX 78212

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

5 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000647073	13103 BROOK GARDEN LN SAN ANTONIO 78232	bexar	$260,530	1,222	1984	20208
000000312148	9915 AUTUMN HOLW CONVERSE 78109	bexar	$200,000	1,632	1996	19135
000001106386	5835 BLONDE CYN SAN ANTONIO 78252	bexar	$192,950	1,233	2007	20180
000000193757	9826 HIGHILLAND CRK SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$187,690	1,210	2001	18326
000000493634	8058 BRDWY ST SAN ANTONIO 78209	bexar	$159,270	995	1964	20270
5 properties			$1,000,440	6,292

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Owner: JAMES LITTLEPAGE

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered